Real Differences and Simple Misunderstandings

I once had a conversation with a Chinese dissident, a man who had been a leader at the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989, who was arrested and imprisoned, and who later made a dramatic escape to America.  In the course of our conversation, he mentioned that he was a Buddhist, nominally, and that Christianity, “because there are so many kinds,” was confusing.
That is a difficult criticism to answer.  There are real differences among our traditions.  Take, for example, communion, confession of sins, and the role of Mary and other saints in our lives. Christians from different traditions view these issues differently.  Many of us have some view of why other traditions teach what they do.  Sometimes, these views are accurate; many times, what we think we know about each other’s beliefs is actually a distortion, an out of focus picture that keeps us from understanding where we might actually agree.
It’s ironic that our confusion began with actual confusion.  In 451 AD, the eastern part of Christianity in the Middle East and the western part in Europe were trying to discern where they agreed and where they disagreed.  They got stuck on a point about the nature of Christ.  Was He truly God and truly man?  Was He always both all at the same time?  Our eastern brothers were working hard to explain that Christ’s two natures were inseparable, that He was ALWAYS God and ALWAYS man all the time.
The biggest obstacle in the discussion was language.  The two sides did not speak the same language.  In such a situation, comprehension is only as good as the best translator in the room at the time.  For much of the last 1,500 years, most Christians in the West have known very little about the doctrines of Eastern believers. Those who knew even a little operated largely under the misunderstanding that those in the East believed that Christ had two natures but never had them both at the same time.  We in the West thought that those in the East believed that Christ was God only sometimes and man only sometimes.
We were wrong.
The translator, no doubt tired and overworked, gave us a distorted view of their faith.  This distortion led many in the West to decree that Christians in the East, with their supposed view of the dual natures of Christ, were not true believers.  Our distortion of their faith removed them from our faith communities.  We were separated into distinct communities, not because we actually disagreed about the nature of Christ, but because of a bad translation in an area of agreement.  How creative the evil one is who loves confusion.
And our misunderstanding was not the end of his creativity.  Because of our misunderstandings, we have spent that last 1,500 years splitting into smaller and smaller communities, each more right than all the others, many of us pointing to each other with disdain rather than showing the love Christ commanded us to pour out for each other.
A unified Church can seek genuine understanding and show love within herself even in the face of real differences.  A discerning Church seeks to determine the foundation for our differences and to overcome our misunderstandings.  Let’s be that Church today.
Information on the dispute with the Eastern Church from Fr. Andrew Tevington.  “The 451AD Split between the Oriental Orthodox Church and the Rest of Christianity.”  St. Thomas Orthodox Foundation.  1 March 2008, accessed 9 March 2015.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.