Raising Jesus: A Review

Christian books tend to be texts Christians write for other Christians.

E.J. Sweeney’s Raising Jesus: The Skeptic’s Guide to Faith in the Resurrection is a book by a believer for skeptics. Yet, this believer presents a different viewpoint.

Sweeney begins as one who is skeptical of the miraculous.

“Where others see divine intervention, I see only coincidence. . . .

“I don’t believe in UFO’s, ET’s, or any other assorted acronymed alien invaders. I always look for the simplest and most rational explanation for any phenomena.

“This is especially true of Jesus’ resurrection.”

Sweeney’s book is divided into three sections. The first, “Virtual Certainty–The Historical Evidence,” discusses various alternative theories about the resurrection. Sweeney takes a scholarly approach but with a light tone. The text is serious and thorough, not dry.

Part II, “An Uncanny Fit–The Resurrection and the Historical Jesus,” is my favorite part. This section discusses how beliefs the early Church embraced did not jive with Jewish expectations of the day. Christ’s disciples did not expect a Messiah to come who would suffer, die, and physically come back.

Jews who believed in a resurrection did not expect a bodily rising until the end times. That explains why early Christians thought the end was near.

One of Sweeney’s conclusions: If Christ’s followers were inventing the resurrection, they would have made it up in a much different form–in line with their own expectations.

God surprising us with His own plan, rather than fulfilling human expectation, further confirms the truth of Christ’s sacrificial death and victory over death.

Sweeney aptly presents and refutes arguments from those who dismiss Christ’s deity and paint His life as an attempted earthly revolution.

Instead, Sweeney shows us how “Jesus went willingly and non-violently to his death (Sweeney’s emphasis). And . . . he didn’t die as a rebel leader, but rather, somehow saw his death as the climactic sacrifice that would establish the New Covenant, the restored relationship between God and humans, and thereby defeat the real enemy which is sin and death.”

After laying out a solid case, Sweeney finishes with Part III: “Life is Hard . . . Then You Die!–The Philosophical Question.”

In this section, Sweeney presents an “absolutely unique correspondence between . . . historical facts and the logic of the universe: Jesus completely embodies a God who made us for his perfect love; Christian faith matches the logic of the universe perfectly.”

Sweeney concludes that the only reasonable response to the historical evidence and the distinctions between the Gospel accounts, supported by history, and Jewish expectations is to accept the reality of what seems, at first glance, to be unreasonable. Christ is God’s Son. Christ sacrificed His life for our sins. Christ rose bodily, overcoming death.

I didn’t agree with everything Sweeney asserted. I’m not that skeptical. Yet I do recommend this book for skeptics and believers alike.

For believers, sitting down with this book clarify much about the understanding Jesus’ followers carried into His ministry–and how that changed because of the resurrection and Christ’s well-documented appearances afterward.

For skeptics, the book lays out a case that you will have to refute only by turning your own logic on its head.

Photo Credit: Raising Jesus cover

Nancy E. Head’s Restoring the Shattered is out in paperback! Get your copy here!

Permissions: You are permitted and encouraged to reproduce and distribute this material in any format provided that you do not alter the wording in any way, do not charge a fee beyond the cost of reproduction, and you credit the author.

Disclosure of Material Connection:  I have not received any compensation for writing this post. I have no material connection to the entities I have mentioned. Restoring the Shattered is published through Morgan James Publishing with whom I do share a material connection. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”

24 Replies to “Raising Jesus: A Review”

  1. In the likeness of The Case for Christ. I’m going to have to look this up. Thank you for the review Ms. Nancy.

  2. I have heard others talk about this book so now I have more reason to check it out. Thanks Nancy

  3. I’m currently working with a skeptic. She is not sure if Jesus is for real, let alone a God who loves her. I’m reading “The Case for Christ” so I can be more equipped to answer her questions. I will add this book to my reading. Thank you for sharing, Nancy.

  4. This is right up my “apologetic alley!” Having a Masters in Apologetics, I had a whole semester course on the evidence for the resurrection. And although I didn’t go into Apologetics because I’m a skeptic, I do have many skeptical family members and friends. So, learning this stuff is mostly for their sake, and to defend the truth of what we believe.

    1. I’d be very interested to know what you think about the book. Let me know, please, if you do get to read it. Thanks, Lisa. God bless!

  5. Thank you for this thoughtful review. It sounds like a very compelling book. I appreciate those who take the time to think through these details, helping believers think!

  6. I’m intrigued for sure! I like that point – “If Christ’s followers were inventing the resurrection, they would have made it up in a much different form–in line with their own expectations.” That’s sound logic!

  7. Thanks for this review, Nancy. Some of my favorite books have been “Evidence that Demands a Verdict” by Josh McDowell. And “The Case for Christ” by Lee Strobel.

    So interesting to see historical evidence that proves the validity of the Holy Scriptures. I like Sweeney’s point on how the disciples would have made up a completely different story of a promised Messiah than the actual accounts of the death and resurrection.

  8. This sounds like a great resource for those who are skeptical and questioning. Thank you for sharing this excellent resource. I loved this statement that there is an “absolutely unique correspondence between . . . historical facts and the logic of the universe: Jesus completely embodies a God who made us for his perfect love; Christian faith matches the logic of the universe perfectly.” These are intriguing statements. Great review!

Comments are closed.